According to reports, Amazon recently filed a constitutional appeal on Amazon’s ruling on the Hanover District Court last year, and the Federal Constitutional Court did not accept its appeal. Last year, Amazon blocked Mi.TO Pharm’s seller account on the grounds of violating the terms of use, but did not give further reasons, and threatened to destroy the seller to save other unprecedented products in its warehouse. To this end, the seller sued Amazon, and the Hannover District Court evaluated Amazon’s behavior as an abuse of dominance. The court ordered to lift the blockade of the seller’s account and prohibit the destruction of the stored goods.
Amazon subsequently filed a constitutional appeal on the ruling. Amazon believes that its basic equal rights have been violated because according to Amazon, regional courts have implemented unilateral “secret procedures” and have not approved legal hearing. The Federal Constitution Court rejected the appeal, saying that Amazon did not oppose the ban at the time, and in the simple procedure, the special court made it clear that he could choose to issue a ban without hearing.
Post time: May-23-2022